Book Review of The Ottoman Crimean War (1853-1856)

Candan Badem. The Ottoman Crimean War (1853-1856). The Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage series. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2010. ISBN 978-90-04-18205-9.  Illustrations. Maps. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xvi, 436. $229.00 (hardcover).

We tend to forget that the so-called Crimean War was fought on seven fronts, including the Lower Danube, Caucasus, and Crimean Peninsula, along with the Black, Baltic, White, and Pacific seas.  There are numerous studies about the Crimean War (1853-1856).  However, this conflict which involved the Ottoman Empire, Russia, Britain, France, Austria, Piedmont-Sardinia, and other states is usually presented from the European point of view.  Dr Candan Badem, Assistant Professor in History at Tunceli University in Turkey, presents a study that investigates the role of the Ottoman Empire in the conflict and the Crimean War’s impact on the Ottoman state and society.

In this work, Badem depicts the political, military, social, and economic situation in the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Abdülmecid (ruled 1839-1861) on the eve of the Crimean War.  The author points out that the Ottoman army and navy “were still not professional in any modern European sense” (p.49).  He investigates the origin of the Russo-Ottoman conflict comparing the Ottoman and European viewpoints.  As such, he stresses British financial and commercial interests in maintaining Ottoman independence, the Franco-Russian dispute over the Holy Places, and Nicholas I’s foreign policy aimed at achieving Russian goals.  The Tsar sent Prince A.S. Menshikov to Istanbul to diplomatically resolve the crisis over the Holy Places in favor of Russia.  Menshikov’s high-handed diplomacy failed to achieve a satisfactory outcome.  Britain and France then brought up their fleets into Beşika Bay at the entrance of the Dardanelles to deter Russian military action.  Tension resulted in Russia invading the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia in July 1853.  The Sublime Porte immediately protested.  British and French diplomats sent the so-called Vienna Note to Istanbul and St Petersburg, seeking to find a compromise, and avoid war.  Negotiations over modifications to the Vienna Note broke down and the Russo-Ottoman war began near the mouth of the Danube River in October 1853.

Badem relates the battles and diplomacy of the Crimean War.  In November 1853, the Ottoman Rumelian army defeated the Russians at the battle of Oltenitsa.  But the event that turned the Russo-Ottoman war into a European one was the naval battle of Sinop in November 1853.  The Russian Black Sea fleet attacked and destroyed the Ottoman fleet.  The author points out that “the Ottoman navy, although probably the fourth or fifth naval power in the world, was not a match for the Russian Black Sea fleet in terms of training and fire power” (p.110).  As a result the European balance of power was disturbed, and the British and French fleets soon entered the Black Sea in December, and their respective governments declared war against Russia in March 1854.

Badem examines the Ottoman war effort on the Danubian, Caucasian, and Crimean fronts.  The author discusses the successes and failures of the Ottoman army.  The Ottoman army on the Danubian front was better led and trained than the army on the Caucasian front.  The French and British forced the Ottomans to play a secondary role in the Crimea.  Overall, the Ottoman military effort suffered from corruption, poor leadership, and poorly trained, armed, and provisioned troops.  Badem stresses that “more soldiers died of diseases, malnutrition, cold and lack of proper housing than of wounds received in battle” (p.409).  The Ottoman generals failed to demonstrate  a sufficient understanding of European warfare.  In the end, the Ottoman Empire did not gain any significant material gains from the conflict which left it nearly financially bankrupt.  Badem stresses that the Empire became part of the European States System in the Peace of Paris (1856), but was more of a European protectorate (p.403).  He shows that Britain and France dictated the alliance and the Ottomans had little input.  Britain and France fought the war not for the sake of the Sublime Porte but for their own interests to contain Russian expansionism.  As such, relations between the Ottoman Empire and its Anglo-French allies were rather shaky.

This is a well-written, valuable study of the Ottoman Empire and the Crimean War.  Badem utilizes archival sources in Turkey, Russia, and Great Britain.  The book is outlandishly expensive at $229.00, but, fortunately, Brill released a paperback version of the study in 2012 which sells for $49.50 (ISBN 978-90-04-22684-5).

Dr William Young
University of North Dakota
Grand Forks, North Dakota

About William Young

Dr William Young is a retired historian with more than 30 years of experience in teaching and research. He has 18 years of teaching experience at the University of North Dakota and Valley City State University. Moreover, he was a historian in the United States Air Force History Program for 15 years. He possesses a doctoral degree in international and military history and master’s degrees in history and international relations. Young is the author of German Diplomatic Relations, 1871-1945 (2006), International Politics and Warfare in the Age of Louis XIV and Peter the Great (2004), and European War and Diplomacy, 1337-1815 (2003). He has also written 42 official Air Force unit histories, two monographs, and other studies. Young is the recipient of many history awards, including three U.S. Air Force Historian of the Year Awards and a U.S. Air Force History Program of the Year Award. He has studied and worked for 13 years overseas in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, and Saudi Arabia. He has traveled extensively in Europe and the Middle East. His hobbies include collecting and reading history books and attending college ice hockey games.
This entry was posted in Austrian Foreign Policy, Book Reviews, British Foreign Policy, Crimean War (1853-1856), Europe in the 19th Century (1815-1914), French Foreign Policy, Ottoman Foreign Policy, Ottoman Wars and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Book Review of The Ottoman Crimean War (1853-1856)

  1. William Young says:

    Reblogged this on Military History.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s